Comments on: Andover High Street Gaming Centre Given Approval

By: Andover Town

Andover Town — Fri, 10 May 2013 14:43:48 +0000

In reply to laraeregister@gawab.com. Do we have a problem with spam? No, because we remove the links that spammers post and occasionally reply to take the mickey out of them :)

By: laraeregister@gawab.com

laraeregister@gawab.com — Fri, 10 May 2013 10:59:43 +0000

Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also
am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation;
we have created some nice practices and we are looking to
swap methods with others, please shoot me an e-mail if interested.

By: STEVE MCKELLAR

STEVE MCKELLAR — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:19:14 +0000

Tony Hooke spoke against the amusement arcade on the basis that noone will come away with
pockets full of money and will only create misery for those who become addicted to these machines.
He asked the councillors to ignore the advise of the officers and find some moral courage.
Everything was going well in the debate until Paul Jackson,head of planning,interjected.He effectively told the elected councillors how to vote.So rather than listen to the 36 written objections and the 3 speakers,9 of the empty headed councillors did what they were told.What is the point of having councillors when the system is so clearly run by the officers? A big Thank you to the councillors who stood up and said no but shame on the rest of you,particularly councillor Phil North who clearly does not understand the needs of this town.